It was in 1987 that we bought a television at home. I was
doing my undergraduate course in English literature. ONIDA (neighbor’s envy
owner’s pride), Dianora and BPL had already ushered flat screen television
sets. However, the latest technology had little influence on me for I wanted a
television set that looked like a television set; the picture tube eating up
the major portion of the box and a side panel with switches and knobs. The
salesman in a television showroom in Trivandrum tried to hammer some sense into
my romantically stubborn head in vain. I wanted a television set that looked
like a television set. The flat screen television set with anti-glare glass for
added value did not turn me on. I was hooked to the conventional one and I found
my heart’s choice in a Keltron Television set. Oh my Keltron; acronym for
Kerala Electronics that had pushed its brand into the national market not as a
television maker but as a maker of traffic lights. With indigenous technology
of traffic light in hand Keltron remained unchallenged in the market for a very
long time; today I do not know what is its condition though I live somewhere
next to its headquarters in Trivandrum.
(Old Keltron Television set)
On the first day of its installation itself, by two sober
looking young men with their resin bags bulging to burst with different kinds
of tools (I remember the important one was a soldering iron and a set of screw
drivers that dismantled the set into various pieces), the reception had gone
into trouble and I had to run up and down the terrace to adjust the antenna
towards the right direction. What a feeling it was to see the picture tube
coming to life for some time with grains (it was raining in Kudappanakkunnu,
the DD station, as we commented jokingly) and later with moving pictures
gliding, swirling, folding, shaking, shivering for some more time to settle
finally into some comprehensible scenes. Breaking down of the television set
(why did you buy Keltron, you should have gone for the ONIDA is the general
refrain) and when the television set fit like a fiddle, breaking down of the
transmission itself (thadassam in Malayalam and Rukawat ke liye khed hai in
Hindi) were a common feature and we learned to live with the vagaries of the television
almighty.
(Shah Rukh Khan in his first serial Fauji)
Then came the Mother of all Television programs; Ramayan by
Ramanand Sagar. Till then our staples were a Hindi movie on Wednesdays and
Chitrahaar on Thursdays, Startrekk, He Man and the Masters of the Universe,
Chithrageetham and some Malayalam movies. One good thing about watching Malayalam
movies (often tear jerkers and sentimental love stories) was that the lovers
separated by space (one in a village and another in a city) could watch it at
the same time imagining that we were in the same room, heaving the same sighs
and shedding the same tears. Yes, we also had Intezzar and Fauji that launched
Shah Rukh Khan as the fast talking Abhimanyu Rai, the young soldier. Benjamin
Gilani, Ajit Vachani, Kavita Chowdhury (Udaan), Vikran Gokhale, Pallavi Joshi
and so on were our favorite stars. While Shammi Kapoor set the television into
fire, Renuka Shahane and Sidharth Kakk told us about the culture of India.
Dr.Narottam Puri discussed sports and Prof.Yashpal taught us Sunday science.
Prannoy Roy had just launched his World this Week series. Miandad, Roger Binny,
Kapil Dev, Gavaskar, David Boon, Narendra Hirvani, Viv Richards, Patric More
and so on were playing cricket. John MacEnroe, Martina Navratolva, Gabriela
Sabatini, Steffi Graff, Boris Becker were playing at Wimbledon. Sergie Boobka was
pole vaulting and Mats Biondi was swimming. Ben Johnson had been just stripped
off of his 100 meter record and Carl Lewis was still running. Then Ramayan
happened and it was a different world then altogether.
Ramayan changed the topography of India. It reunited India
in the line of a common imagination called Ramayan, the cultural saga that ran
through the veins of India’s collective memory. Arun Govil became Rama
incarnated and Dipika Chikhalia was unparalleled in her Sita avtar. Wrestler
Dhara Singh got a second life through his Hanuman and many others got their
second lease of acting life with Ramayan. But who cared about the other actors?
Rama, Sita, Laxman, Hanuman and Ravan had filled the imagination of the people.
For Ramanand Sagar it was not a difficult thing to make a series like that.
There was no foregrounding to the story needed; the audience was already into narrative
of Ramayan through its various incarnations and version in various parts of the
country. Sagar based his work on Tulsidas Ramayan which in fact had forwarded a
Maryada Purushottam Ram, a flawless king who was neither defeated by any nor
doubted by his people or his wife herself despite his desertion at some point.
It was a clean narrative and people suddenly found an anchor to their lives; no
other work of visual narrative had held the nation in thrall like that before;
Sholay had but it had the overtones of Ramayan. The secularization of Sholay’s
narrative was good for the post –independent India where the good and bad were
at loggerheads and the Hindu and Muslim were still finding their co-existence
under the benevolent landlords who by hook or crook would take revenge on the
wrong doers. Veeru and Vijai were perfect Ram-Laxman combination.
(Sanjay Kumar as Thakur in Sholay)
Ramayan’s success re-wrote the urban as well as rural life
and its organizations. People looked forward to Sunday mornings with a new set
of rituals and none moved when the serial was on. If there was a power failure
there would have been a riot. A secular country overworked to keep things
smooth for the transmission of an epic which had religious ramifications. But
nobody was looking at the Hindutva side of it as it unraveled the cathartic
plights of Rama and Sita. However, the narrative definitely worked for
consolidating the Hindu sentiments in the country. Ravan was no Muslim invader
but finding a common enemy in a narrative was something that the fledgling
Hindutva forces wanted at that time. The success of Ramayan soon brought
B.R.Chopra into action who in the following year (1988) launched his Mahabharat
serial that further became the rallying point of Hindutva ideology. People with
tender feeling rekindled for the ‘sanatan’ values by the serials were game for
establishing a Hindu India or rather they could have been easily cajoled into
the epic narratives that had taken political meanings sooner than later.
Demolishing Babri Masjid on 6th December 1992 was just three years
away and as in Sholay the Takur said, the Hindu leaders could say, ‘loha garam
hai maardo hatoda’. The ground was prepared it was just a question of time that
the Masjid fell.
(Dipika Chikhalia who acted as Sita in Ramayan serial with Mr.Narendra Modi)
I was not too fond of Ramayan. I used to take my red BSA
cycle and used to ride around the village which was almost deserted during
those hours. During Mahabharat times I was already moved to the city leaving
the village home locked, and the same BSA cycle was my companion in the city
roads on those Sundays, lying absolutely empty. They used to look like the
Corona locked down days today. The city looked like George Di Chirico’s surreal
paintings. I could touch my shadow for it was so thick in its loneliness and I
used to enjoy that aloneness tremendously. I got much of the Ramayan and
Mahabharat details from the film magazines (I was a subscriber of the film news
weekly paper called Screen, published by the Indian Express). The politics of
Ramayan had intrigued me though I could not put my fingers right into the eye
of it. I remember writing a critique of Ramayan and sending it to the then
famous cultural weekly Kalakaumudi edited by S.Jayachandran Nair only to get it
back in the return mail. I still do not know whether it was the immature
arguments that caused the rejection or the absolute anonymity of the author
(almost a decade later I worked under the same editor as a special
correspondent from Delhi).
(S.Jayachandran Nair, one of the prominent magazine editors in India)
Now it is said that Ramayan is in for a re-telecast through
the same government interface. Interestingly, with the arrival of competitive
private channels, both Ramayan and Mahabharat got remade and re-televised using
new anchors and new gen actors only find no place in the minds of the audience.
They got widely dubbed into various regional languages which became a time pass
than some serious stuff that could engage the audience the way their pioneering
tele versions had done a decade and half back. The re-telecast of the original
Ramayan serial is said to be to fill the vacant times of the people who are
caught in their homes with nothing much to do due to the corona lock down. But
the suggestion is ominous, at least it looks like that to me for the right wing
government at the center has lost a polarizing narrative with the relentless
Anti –CAA protests followed by the quite unexpected historical and fateful
leveler, Covid 19. An empty mind is a Devil’s workshop, so goes the adage.
Ramayan serial is given to empty minds where Ramayan could do some Devil’s job;
instead of elevating the minds of the people to embrace the world with a new
vigor and perspective it could make people sectarian in the worst way possible
by providing some ether moments to think about an all Hindu country where an imaginary
Ram could rule once again and bring prosperity and patriarchy with added strength.
It could be detrimental to the post-Corona mindset of the Indians, while the
whole world is debating the possible ways of rechanneling the life energy in the
post-catastrophe scenario. It can’t be religious by all means necessary, but
India government thinks that it could be religious in many ways for their
nefarious political ends. I cross my fingers and wait to see what people would
make out of it. Watching a serial for the sake of nostalgia is one thing and
for conscious ideological deliberation is another thing altogether. Still we
need to see how many us have the mind to spend an hour with that when there are
more pressing matters to deal with or interesting things to engage with
elsewhere in the smartphones.
-
JohnyML
Nice read. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteBut are you not overthinking it? Ramayan/Mahabharat caused the resurgence of BJP?