(Book cover of Maxim Gorky's Mother)
How many of us consider our mothers as our ideal? Many of us
say, yes we do. It would almost sound like a crime if someone says that he or
she does not consider their mother as ‘the’ ideal. I have a friend in my village,
who for some reason had changed his surname and replaced it with his mother’s
name. He had literary ambitions and the adding his mother’s name to his own
name perhaps gave some weight to his otherwise ordinary sounding name, or he
thought so. Though his literary ambitions did not take off the way he imagined,
the name got stuck. There are a few other well known people who use their
mothers’ name as their surname. The familiar examples are Sanjay Leela Bansali,
the film-maker and Vivek Vilasini, the artist. Selecting a surname or a pen
name is generally prompted by some sort of an ideal that we hold closer to our
heart and intellect too. During my formative years as a writer or rather during
a time when I had cherished the ambition to become a writer, I had adopted a
surname and it was ‘Johny Merick Laxman’. I think the Merick part of it came
from a novel, Green Mansions by William Henry Hudson. But the name had proven
unlucky for me because most of the manuscripts that I had sent to the magazines
came back to me by the next post with due apologies from the editors. Then when
I was in my late teens, I opted for a name ‘Alex John’, a clearly Christian
sounding name because I thought that Christian names were more secular than a
Hindu name. The name was lucky as I could publish some articles with that
byline though I abandoned it soon for my real name, JohnyML. The only other pen
name that I had adopted was ‘Janakiraman’ and a couple of articles were
published under that name in late 1990s. Somehow I never felt that I should use
my mother’s name as my surname for a change. Of late I see a lot of feminists
use their mothers’ names as their surname at least in their facebook pages.
(legendary author late Vaikom Mohammed Basheer)
I did not opt for my mother’s name as a possible surname
because I never considered her as my ideal. I had different ideals at different
times and it was never my mother. It may sound slightly ungrateful to her but
the truth is that my mother was never my ideal. She has always been there as a
force that endorses and corrects at the same time but never leads me to a
certain point. She is not even a fellow traveller; maximum I could say that my
mother is a spectator in the gallery. She is one amongst many and compared to
those many in the crowd she may be understanding her son a little less than
others despite the strong emotional connect. I think it is same with all the
mothers. They are connected to their sons and daughters and the connection does
not naturally get translated as understanding. That’s why, when certain pivotal
decisions are taken by the sons and daughters in their lives, the mothers tend
to disagree with it. They refuse to understand the logic of your decision. They
call it their ‘experience speak’ but they look more hurt than yourself because
the connection is always emotional. If a mother says that she understands her
children very well, then it should be tinged with some lie. That understanding
is more about receptiveness. Do good, bad or ugly, if you are doing it, it
should be right, that’s how mothers react to most of their children. It is a
sort of receptiveness originated out of love and concern than understanding.
You may kill and come back to your mother, she will not reject you. Rejecting
mothers could be seen in sentimental movies. They could even shoot their sons
down and hack a daughter to death for a larger cause of the nation or
patriarchy in general. Such mothers are fictitious than fictional. In fiction
mothers are always convincing.
(A stage production still of Brecht's Mother Courage and her Children)
As my mother was not my ideal, I was looking for other women
ideals in my life and I found them in fictions and fictionalized facts. When
you read a fiction you do not know whether you are reading fictionalized facts
or fiction masquerading as facts. Whatever be the case, as they say life is
stranger than fiction, I got my women ideals from fictions. One of the strong
mother images that comes to my mind is that of the mother of the great Malayalam
writer, Vaikom Muhammed Bashir. Bashir left his home to know the world and in
the process he came to know that the country was under colonial rule. He was
fascinated by the Gandhian ideals and he took the plunge and became a freedom
fighter. He was arrested by the British Police and was sent to the jail. One
day he was released and he came home late at night. And to his surprise he saw
his mother waiting for him with a freshly cooked dinner. He asked how was it so
and how did she know that he was coming on that day. To that query his mother
replied; ‘ever since you left home, every day and every night, I waited for you
with food thinking that you would return that day.’ Bashir could not contain
his tears and when I read it for the first time I too could not control my
tears. Then I wanted my mother to be like that. But I had never left home. Had
I left home, would my mother have waited for me every day and every night like
that? It was impossible to imagine my mother doing that. But looking back I
realize that every mother in every country does that for their missing children
or the children who have gone out of home without mentioning the date of our
return.
(Rosasharn from Grapes of Wrath- stage production still)
I do not like sentimental mothers. For me, a sentimental mother
is one who cries for no reason. A mother who cries even when she talks about an
imagined calamity, a mother who cries when her son’s or daughter’s name is
printed on a local pamphlet for winning some frivolous competition, a mother
who cannot say a good thing without crying is a sentimental mother. And our
films are full of such sentimental mothers. I hate the actresses who act as
sentimental mothers only because their job is to sacrifice and cry. At the drop
of a hat they would make some sacrifice and cry. They will bring out small
little issues from some past and shed copious tears. My mother, like many other
mothers, is exactly like that. So I have named my mother after one of the
Malayalm actresses who is famous for her mother roles with full of sentiments.
I could not make my mother an ideal in my life primarily because she is very
sentimental. One could be sentimental to certain extent but crying for anything
and everything cannot be tolerated. However, the irony is that when a crisis
comes to their lives, they steel themselves and act. The horrible thing is that
after doing that they spend their nights dipped in tears. They make their
children’s life hell by indulging in such acts. But you cannot kill your
mother. So you tolerate her. You may be surprised why I am talking like that
about my mother. I talk about my mother like this because she has taught me how to
be sentimental and strong at the same time. While I like the strong part, I
hate the sentimental side in me. But that is what many people like to see in a
man. An apparently strong looking man appears to be more appealing to others,
especially to the opposite sex, when he breaks down. Sometimes I think mothers
prepare their children to be worldly wise in a cunning way; by tears.
(Actress and Director Suhasini Maniratnam)
My search for an ideal mother or woman continued and I was
still looking into literature for the role models. It was then I read the
Russian writer Maxim Gorky’s novels, ‘Mother’ and ‘My Universities’. In Mother,
you see the protagonist’s mother fighting with the jail authorities to see her
revolutionary son and also she becomes a revolutionary by smuggling out
pamphlets and distributing them amongst the workers and peasants. I was in high
school and mentally I was not prepared to take so much political gravity as
discussed in the Russian novels. Still I liked the mother in the novel ‘Mother’.
My father was a socialist and definitely not a communist. But he was interested
in communist ideals and our home library had the collected works of Karl Marx
and Frederich Angels, and also most of the famous Russian political thinkers
and writers like Plekhanov, Bucchanin, Chekhov and so on. I had tried reading
them at that point but it was only Gorky and Tolstoy and later the poet
Mayakovsky caught my attention. Mother was a great influence at that time. It
was almost during the same time I read John Steinbeck’s ‘Grapes of Wrath.’ In
this American exodus novel there is a young mother figure, Rosashan. She in
fact breast feeds a dying old man because she could not find any other food
nearby. Such kind of sacrifice intrigued me as a young boy and I was
questioning the very idea of motherhood. On the one hand we had our mundane
mothers toiling in the kitchen and in workplaces and on the other we had these
great mothers participating in revolution and exodus. My small mind could not
understand that our mothers too had made enough revolution in their lives to
survive and to bring us up. This literary interest on mothers intensified in
college and Bretolt Brecht’s play, ‘Mother Courage’ came closer to my
sensibilities. The irony was after looking for all these ideal mothers, it was
in the image of actress Suhasini that I finally found the ideal mother figure.
In retrospection, I understand that it was my heart taking over all those
intellectual efforts that I had employed to find an ideal mother. To tell you
the truth the image of Suhasini also was a passing one and soon it gave way to
more abstract feelings about women in general and mothers in particular.
(A still from Hindi movie , Mother India)
A mother is a mother is a mother, is how I could explain a
mother, if I borrow from Gertrude Stein. My mother, like mother of anybody else
in the world, was there as a player, stage and a backdrop during my formative
years. In the beginning, mother was a feeling, a smell, a touch and a voice.
The body odour of my mother is still fresh in my nose as that could not be
replaced with any other fragrance in the world. My mother’s sweat had the smell
of spices, fire and suppressed dreams. My mother was a government servant so I believe
that she had the smell of the old files that contained the sufferings of so
many people. Like a fisherwoman who smells of fish and sea, my mother emanated
the fragrance of the Revenue Department, which I discerned as the smell of
Arabic gum, carbon paper and ink. The general noise that accompanied the image
of my mother was her shrill voice that chided me into senses, the noise of the
old fans in her office and the tapping sound of the typewriters where beautiful
young women like my mother typed away the orders that sealed and opened the
fates of many people. My mother was my destiny at that time; without her it was
very difficult to function. But she was never the way. The way to reach her was
goodness, propriety and dignity. If I was away from these qualities, she looked
unapproachable. When I was good and well behaved, she was as close as my shadow
and breath. Yet, she did not become my
ideal. I was running behind the mirages. I wanted my mother to be my ideal but
that place was stolen by my father. I became the reflection of my father.
Father was my destination and my mother was an unchartered path that looked
apparently designed and chartered. I had to find my destination through the
secret paths of my mother. Hence my mother, like the mothers all over the world
remained an enigma to me. Today I am trying to unravel that mystery. Then my
mother ceases to be my mother; she becomes the mother of all and a woman in the
process.
No comments:
Post a Comment