(Aasharam Bapu)
Aasharam Bapu is in news because he has made this weird
comment about the late gang rape victim. According to this so called satsang
leader, the victim should have taken the name of god, folded the hands before
the rapists and said that they were her brothers. This would have prevented the
brutes from committing the murderous act on that hapless girl. In a way he puts
the onus of crime on the girl. It is her lack of fear for god, which had caused
her subjection to brutal force and eventual death, according to this so called
spiritual leader. This statement also could be further interpreted that the
girl was not a custom fearing one. She did not fold her hands before the
rapists and did not remind them of their brotherly duties of protecting her
dignity. This ‘spiritual’ man must have said it in all good faith according to
his belief in Hindu Dharma, which he has wrongly understood as a set of codified
laws that subjects women. For him even at the direst of situations a woman
should not resist instead she should supplicate so that her rights will be
delivered ‘naturally’.
Imagine we are living in 21st century. And we let
people like Aasharam Bapu to speak like this. Our politicians and law enforcing
agencies let these people to talk like this because politics, business and
religion have become one and the same thing with the same vested interests. We
living in time where people are asked to fear god not to love him/her. When
people are asked to fear or when they are threatened by greater calamities from
above, people subjugate themselves to the forces of power. God unfortunately
has become a symbol of power, which is menacing and threatening. God has become
a thug turned politician who speaks to people about socio-spiritual and
politico-economic reformation holding a weapon right at their temples. Fear is
the biggest point of investment for both the political and religious leaders.
They threaten people with dire consequences. So people stand in queue to vote
for their tormentors and queue to worship them.
(Akshay Kumar and Paresh Rawal in Oh My God)
First of we have to understand a few things. This is a
country where the movie ‘Oh My God’ (OMG) was successfully ran and collected.
Kanji Bhai (Paresh Rawal), a confirmed skeptic files a case against all the
religious leaders in this country as the Insurance agency refuses to pay the
damage of his business citing that ‘the acts of God’ cannot be compensated. So
Kanji Bhai goes to court saying that if it was an act of god, his retailers on
earth should pay him. Lord Krishna befriends him in a contemporary guise. Kanji
becomes famous because his arguments in the court are simply logical therefore
valid. The religious leaders are brought to answer the questions. Kanji,
prodded by Lord Krishna (played by Akshay Kumar) reads Bhagavat Gita and finds
points for his arguments. And just to make Kanji understand that there is god,
Krishna gives him a paralytic attack and saves him from it also. When Kanji is
in hospital the religious leaders start a sect on Kanji Maharaj and invest Rs.
400 crore rupees to pay the damages to people who are affected by ‘the act of
God’. They are shrewd enough to start a sect in the name of Kanji so that they
can earn the money back in no time.
Finally Lord Krishna’s presence is proved by a key chain, which a
recuperated Kanji is asked to throw away by Krishna’s voice and he does so.
Despite this film’s success and message if still Indian
people are thronging before shrines, temples and spiritual gurus like Aasharam
Bapu, they have absolutely missed the point. First of all they missed the point
in the act of throwing away the key chain. The key chain flies towards a
temple. But the director has very consciously made it fly beyond the temple and
disappear in the infinite vastness of sky. It is a moment of revolution in
Bollywood films but nobody recognized it. Most of the Bollywood films social
ills are justified or the acts of cruelties are corrected through godly
interventions manifested through a storm starting from a temple idol or the
clanging of temple bells or something. Religious sanction is (mis) interpreted
as social sanction. But in this movie, the key chain of Krishna does not go
into the temple. It goes beyond pointing out the Sanatana Hindu Dharma
philosophical fact the god resides in the universe and the individual’s search
should be to attain that without mediation but through meditation. The jeevatma
(individual soul) would merge with the Paramatma (eternal soul/god) through
yogic meditations. No priest is needed for attaining godhead. Besides, Hindu
philosophy says that Jeevatma and Paramatma are not different they are one and
the same. Only the realization is needed to attain than undivided selfhood,
where even self does not exist.
(OMG Poster)
The second point that we missed in this movie is the last
statement or a challenge thrown at Kanji Bhai by a spiritual leader (an
effeminate leader as a spoof of some real spiritual guru) played by Mithun
Chakravarty. He tells Kanji Bhai, look man, the spiritual pursuit is quite
addictive. People are afraid of god so after some time they would come back to
us. In fact, what lingers on from the movie unfortunately is not the brave act
of Kanji Bhai but the brutal and fatal statement of the spiritual guru who
knows for sure that his establishment thrives on the fear of people who are
bound to be afraid of anything and everything. This film should have changed
the mental make of the common men in this country. Perhaps, if it was promoted
in the right way (not as an Akshay Kumar starrer) and brought into the
attention of the international intelligentsia it would have created much better
results in our society. The film is absolutely uncompromising. But somehow it
failed to reach people with its pivotal message: discard all religious and
spiritual leaders.
Religion is an anachronism and ‘spiritual leader’ is a
linguistic aberration. Religions are establishments formed around the
philosophies propounded by the seers and sages. Their philosophies were the
essence of human sublimation mostly originated out of going deeper into the
reasons for the human existence and the pertaining issues. Most of the sages
and visionaries had reached a stage of realizing the god where the experience
of it is the ultimate. To tell this to the world, they needed to find words. It
was really difficult for them to express the experience which is beyond words
through words. Hence they created a language which was metaphorically loaded. These
metaphors paved way for symbolisms and they were the corner stones of the
establishments that became religions. Religions were formulated for decent
social conduct. The establishments were the necessity of the times in order to
sublimate the human beings from the crass animality. By now we have reached to
a stage where we do not need religions as those establishments do not solve any
of our problems in our lives. But of course, the philosophies definitely give
us solutions if we have the mind to study them and become aware about our own
existence.
(Buddha)
Similarly spiritual leadership is a linguistic aberration.
It is a linguistic aberration because spiritual pursuit is not a collective
thing or mass movement. Only for a mass movement leadership is needed. Gurus
are not spiritual leaders because they do not lead a pack and they do not
establish a religion. They are just helpers in realizing the people to become
aware. That’s why it is said that Buddha was not a Buddhist, nor Jesus Christ a
Christian. People built establishments around their words became Buddhists and
Christians and any other religious followers. Establishments originate out of
fear and out of instilling fear amongst masses. A frightened mass needs leaders
to lead them to some destination. In the case of religions the destination is
abstract. And most of us forget the fact that spirituality resides in one’s own
self. It is here and now and it is sitting within this ‘I’. Once the I is understood
spiritual liberation is manifested. The process is spirituality and the life
invested for this realization is a spiritual life. Such lives do not need any
leaders.
Any act could be a spiritual act in our lives provided if one
does it with complete awareness. I look at the kids and their activities. They
are not conscious of what others are thinking about their acts. They act and
they themselves become the act and the acted. They do it in complete awareness
though they do not translate that awareness into spiritual terms. Hence,
anything that we do with complete awareness and are not conscious about what
others are thinking about us and are not pre-occupied with the worldly
judgments and achievements, our acts too become spiritual act. Giving alms to
beggars or doing charity work cannot be spiritual acts because when we do it we
do it with a sense of achievement or a sense of getting liberated out of our
sins or something of that sort. But if giving becomes the most natural thing and
also receiving becomes the same, we become spiritual. We don’t need any
Aasharam Bapus for that.
(Jesus Christ)
But people prefer Aasharam Bapus and they kill a Buddha.
People prefer A.Bapus because they are afraid of what they do not know. How can
one be afraid of what one does not know? That’s why people say that you should
be beware of your friends than your enemies because the friends know you well
and you don’t know your enemies at all. When you don’t know your enemy you don’t
have enemies either. That means when you don’t know god you need be afraid of
god. If someone frightens you in the name of god you need not feel challenged
at all. The moment you understand god as your friend you need to worry. But the
moment you realize that god is not a different person sitting up there you just
become aware that god is not a stranger, he is you only. How are you afraid of
yourself? How can you say that your hands would grab someone else’s dignity
without your knowledge? When you realize that you are god, the establishments
vanish, only the philosophies remain. They remain because they are pure poetry.
Poetry is not an establishment.
People do not see the god in themselves. So they go behind
A.Bapu’s. They consider a physical trainer as a sage. They regard an
interpreter of slokas and poetry as god. Total misunderstanding is what brings
people to satsangs and shivirs. The danger of these spiritual leaders is also
the same as their followers. They slowly start believing that they are really
gods or spiritual leaders. They act according to what the frightened followers
expect from them. This is a mutual blackmail. The more a spiritual leader
becomes successful in gathering people around him or her the more he implements
the strategies of fear and threat. These spiritual leaders would not tell them
to leave their fear. Instead they would tell the people to read more and more
scriptures without understanding a word, make donations, do exercise, go on
certain diets, visit temples and so on. And inadvertently all those become a
part of the larger establishment called religion/s.
(A temple in Vakkom where I used to spend a lot of time in my childhood- It was just a temple with no boundary walls and all then)
Having said that, one might ask me whether I am against all
religions or going to temples or things like that. I am not a hypocrite. I am
not against religious philosophies. I am against religious establishments. But
then you may ask why do I go to temples? I am not an avid visitor of religious places.
But I have visited a lot of religious shrines both popular and lesser known,
and absolutely unknown temples. I have visited churches and mosques. If given a
chance I don’t mind going to a place of worship and sit there for some time. I
am not a hypocrite to say that I do go to places of worship in order to see the
architectural beauty or their art historical relevance. I do stand in front of
the shrines, fold my hands and try to pray something. But each time I try to
meditate in this way, I ask several questions to myself. The more I ask the
more I go away from meditation. I think. I keep thinking. The more I think I
remain in the plane where I stand. So I cannot say that I have attained any
kind of spiritual union with god or I have realized god in me. What I could say
is that I do things with maximum awareness so that I need not worry or regret
about my actions.
Does my visit to temples differ from those people who are
not ‘educated’ like me? Do they look inferior in my eyes? Not at all. According
to me, temples are the places created for the congregation of people to worship
a deity in the middle of all sublimated things. All what is related to a ‘temple’
has a lot to do with human education and piety. It has all forms of arts in its
complimentary edifices and rituals including music, literature, fine arts and
performing/performance art. All these things could together create an ambience
in which a devotee could transpose him/herself to a state of godliness, which
in fact a realization of god in oneself but manifested in the temple idol. A
temple is meant for such realization. But today temples have become problem
solving centers and god had become a chief consultant with a lot of sub consultants
around him. If you have a bank loan, you consult god. God’s mediator tells you
to visit that temple on Tuesdays and do a particular puja for six months. But
that mediator does not tell you that you need to pay the installments on time.
So in fact they defer the real issue. Temples are not meant for that. Also I do
not visit any commercial temples which are created for business purpose. Nor do
I believe in temples that are famous for their wealth. But I have visited most
of them and come out with a sense of dejection.
(Any place could be a place to meditate)
As places of meditation one should be going to very small
temples where there are not much organized rituals. If you really want to
meditate, in fact you need not even go anywhere. As you are the center of the
universe, the focus of all the universal energies is in the place where you
sit. So you just need to sit where you are sitting or standing or walking. One
just needs to be aware of that place and become one with that place. People
travel to hills to meditate or sea shore because they just don’t want to sit in
the same place they have been sitting for long. It is just to change the
ambience nothing much. A hillside will not bring you better meditative effects
than the fourteenth floor of an apartment building where you are residing. A
forest will not bring you more calmness than a city center provided you are
unreceptive of the energies around you. Then one more thing, you need not sit
cross legged to meditate. You need not know the chakras and energy points in
your body to meditate. You need not do pranayama and other exercises to
meditate. You just need to do whatever you are doing with complete awareness. That's
why a butcher gets salvation and good sleep while a professional sage worries
about his bank balance. Mediation does not come from learning, it comes from
being meditation itself.
The day you become aware of what you are doing and you
become one with your deed, you don’t need any more A.Bapus because you have
overcome the fear of a punishing god. You have become the friend of your god
and you have become a great friend of yourself. If so how can you think of
violating anybody’s rights and dignity, whether you are drunk or not.
1 comment:
Post a Comment