(Pic courtesy: Google. Representational Purpose only)
I get invitation
to attend art exhibition openings. They come through various mediums including personal
phone calls. I hardly attend exhibition openings these days. I ask myself why
have I grown so disinterested in attending the art dos. They are the platforms
to do socializing and networking. And ironically, whenever I curate a show I
expect people to come in hoards to attend the opening. If they too grow cold towards
the openings what would be the result. Deserted galleries and lackluster inaugural
functions. No artist would like it. No gallerist would like to see her gallery
echoing her own sighs on the opening day.
Recently, a
senior art critic asked me why I did not do the blog entries anymore. Writer’s
block? she asked. I hadn’t thought about such a scenario. I had gone through
such phases when words stood aloof. I don’t find myself in that situation now.
I need a white page, a Microsoft Word page so that I could key in my thoughts
without a break. There is no arrogance in saying this. My daily training has helped
me achieve this. Yet, I do not write that much these days. Some kind of
lethargy? Don’t I feel anymore the need to purge myself of my winding thoughts?
I want my
writings to be clear and lucid. A reader should have easy access not only to the
text but also to the content. Someone should not stand before my writing as if
he was standing before a thick and tall concrete wall infested with graffiti and
rhetoric. Easy access is a much mistaken concept. Most of the people think that
accessible things are less valuable. You make something so complex that the
very inaccessibility makes people look at it in awe. Words and ideas become
like celebrities and VIPs locked up in fortresses made up of concrete and
security measures. They come out once in a while to wave at the hapless admirers
who scream at a single glace, the spreading of hands and the dimpled smile.
(Pic courtesy: Google. Representational Purpose only)
Whenever I
see the names of artists printed on the invitation cards they look strange and
unfamiliar. True, I do not know most of them. I wistfully remember those times
when I took pains to travel to different places and studios to see young artists
working. That time has gone and the concerns that ruled artists in those times
are also have become a thing of past. Today the concerns of the artists are
different. They want to be a part of major exhibitions and international fairs.
They want to be in international residencies and art camps. They want to be in
a different world with their works. What do they address in their art, I ask myself
and find no answer. I have heard from places that the youngsters too address
the issues like migration, environmental crises, wars, poverty, human suffering
and injustice. They are not different from our generation in that sense.
Where do
they differ and how do they differ then? I do not have any clear answer here.
Those young artists who are lauded by the private establishments that almost
monopolize the art scene in India and elsewhere project themselves as the new
age messiahs with a new language and approach. They use new materials and
contemporary technologies. May be I am too old to understand the technology in
a practical sense but I do understand their impacts in the contemporary human
life and their influence in understanding the past and shaping the future. What
I do not understand is the language that they use. They are wafer-thin and stand
only because that there are armatures and scaffolds of words around them. They
prop them up like dilapidated houses restructured by a whimsical architecture
who excels in disuse of spaces.
(Pic courtesy: Google. Representational Purpose only)
Once I went
to an all women art camp. I went through the works that were done hastily because
it was a single day camp. Most of them had generated images that didn’t throw
up any surprises. Same vaginas, wombs, blood, bird’s nest, eggs, splayed legs,
kitchen utensils and so on. I thought, why didn’t they have any other self-image
other than the stereotypical ones. Lynda Nochlin and other feminist
theoreticians of her ilk had talked about reclaiming the female body from the
clutches of the male desires and possessiveness. That was almost sixty years
ago. The world has changed since then. How long are you going to make the same
thing, ululating the female vulva, blood and tears?
I ask this
question unto myself. What’s the point in saying the same thing in new mediums
and materials? Can’t there be a different lens, a different ken and a different
scale to see and measure oneself? If I say thing, I will be called a misogynist
and a chauvinist. It is not just about the female artists, it is about every other
artist. When you say the truth, they call you names. Better keep quiet.
-JohnyML
No comments:
Post a Comment