(Begum Tyeba Lipi work presented at the DCAW)
Delhi Contemporary Art Week (DCAW) is in its second edition.
Held at Delhi’s India Habitat Centre Visual Arts Gallery, this four day affair
is a mini-fair with tall claims that include ‘art education’ and a resistance
to the ‘sidelining’ of contemporary art in the bigger art platforms and with a declared
aim of promoting the young artists and their works. One of the senior art
gallerists in Delhi says, ‘people buy art for art’s sake.’
Let me put this into perspective: nobody cares for
contemporary art and it is our last ditch attempt to salvage the
situation. The high sounding claims are
simply euphemisms that hide the quotidian nature of soliciting clients in the
art market. India has an art market driven mostly by three or four names
starting with Souza and ending with Raza. The lone contemporary warrior in this
gladiators’ ring is Subodh Gupta. That does not mean that those other well
known contemporary artists are already out of the race. They are there but they
are not really minting gold for the art market. Solution: find new and fresh talents
who could be sold for smaller amounts. That is where I would tie these two
claims of ‘education’ and ‘buying art for art’s sake’.
(from DCAW)
If you just look back to our art scene, it was not too far
that the galleries in India (the elephants among the ants, if you permit me to
reverse Sujata Gidla’s title) that said they did not want the public to walk in
but they want the buyers to knock. The cultural responsibility of the art
sellers (which a seller of any product would show in the market) had even gone
on vacation in those days. These galleries wanted only the buyers to walk in
thereby almost turning the gallery spaces into exclusive viewing rooms. If you
compare the experience of catching up with glamorous openings in the suburban
museums and corporate houses of the steel companies that lay far away from the
city centres you would know why and how art has become an exclusive affair. But
I should say they have not completely turned misanthropes; they arrange one bus
for the plebeian artists and art lovers to be ferried to and fro, who basically
make the viewers and the rest is guests.
So the statement, ‘at least buy art for art sake’ is not a
statement that is for helping the art scene in any manner. It is a plea before
the final rolling down of the shutters of the small scale art establishments
which are already feeling the heat of the auction houses, private museums and
the big time dealers. The interesting thing is that the biggest art dealers in
India (as they deal with the biggest contemporary artists), Nature Morte also
take part in this exercise called ‘DCAW’. By making art an exclusive and highly
sophisticated property these are the same agencies now joining hands with the
low end galleries to create this ‘cultural’ plea that the young and rich should
come forward to buy the young and talented ‘new’ contemporaries.
(work by Mahibur Rahiman? from DCAW)
When we talk about art for art sake, we should also ask,
where was this art for art’s sake argument till last season where art was all
about social responsibility (socially responsive art) and being political. So
today we have DCAW presenting that kind of art that is sold for the sake of
selling. Am I wrong here? What happens in this? In the process, the artists who
are supposedly politically inclined are either completely removed from the
scene or are wrongly represented. You may not see a Riyas Komu; and the reason
is clear. They don’t need political art. But you see an Atul Dodiya; that means
they present him after removing the political fangs and claws. I am not going
to argue with the people who come forward to ask me whether Atul Dodiya is
political or not at all. Same is the case with Shilpa Gupta, Anju Dodiya,
Zarina Hashmi, Nalini Malani, Begum Tyeba Lipi, Mahbur Rahiman, oh yes, Raques
Media Collective and so on. Till the last season they were political artists
but in DCAW we see them as devoid of any political edge; or at least they are
presented so.
Coming to the educational claim; how do you educate the
society through such expositions? So the pertinent question is this: Who are
you trying to educate about art? Anyway it is not the public because the public
is not going to be buy art. Nor does the public really keen on what these
artists are trying to say as our country is currently going through a very
tough situation. So they are trying to reach out to a section of the public
that is affluent and care less about the socio-political on goings in the
country. But to make them invest in the newbies they have to have some interest
in the presented artists. That means, they are either going to buy the already
known ones from the exhibits or they are going to pick up a few fresh ones in a
dirt cheap price. There would be so many lucrative offers from the galleries
including a buy back policy, part payment mode or even EMIs.
(from DCAW)
This experience is not new at all. During the end of the
1990s when the Indian economy was showing positive signs of growth and the
global players were investing in the Indian market, a new generation of rich
middle class came up who had some dispensable money which they wanted to invest
positively. Art was projected as an investment area and many were coaxed and
cajoled in investing in the art market, which responding to the international
art market trends showed the signs of surging. This prevailed for around five
years and by 2004 a huge haul was there in the art market where the investors
started feeling high confidence and hopes. So the low end works were put away
and big scale, big bucks works were brought into the scene. That explains the
spectacular works done by even the crappiest of artists in the past decade. Today
we are back to square one.
We are back to square one because we (means the galleries)
are telling the world that ‘please buy art for the sake of art.’ Forget the
politics, culture and all what you attach with art. And what is unsaid is
simply this: you buy now and get the profit in the coming years. The elections
are coming and I am sure that there will not be many who would pump in money to
buy art at this precarious market situation. Besides, the art that the DCAW
shows in the whole affair (a majority of them by the new artists) do not have
anything to do with the present Indian realities or socio-political climate.
They are all custom made products that look like sharing an international
sensibility. And international sensibility is the sensibility that irons out
all the differences and the ability for political dissent. Perhaps the
gallerist is right, they are all art for art’s sake, not for anything else.
One of the gallerists says that the contemporary art gets
sidelined in the large scale expos. I think that was a self delusional
statement for the India Art Fair is all about contemporary art and all those
world famous art fairs and biennales are all about contemporary art. Only in
the auction houses the contemporary art gets sidelined. What you see in the
DCAW is a replica of the India Art Fair. I could read that IAF is a strategic partner
to this affair. I am sure that IAF is not self delusional. This is an effort to
see whether these galleries could undercut the dominance of the IAF which is no
longer an Indian affair. I would say this is the last ditch effort of the metro
galleries to stay afloat against the onslaught of the private museums, auction
houses and dealers and the ideologically misguiding government art establishments. Art is the last thing in their minds.
No comments:
Post a Comment